Post 1989 Jazz |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | |||
Cannonball With Hat
Forum Senior Member VIP Joined: 10 Apr 2011 Location: The Opium Den Status: Offline Points: 1212 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 04 Jun 2012 at 4:27pm |
||
Thank god...because 1992 was the best year for jazz ever.
|
|||
Hit it on Five.
Saxophone Scatterbrain Blitzberg Stab them in the ears. |
|||
darkshade
Forum Senior Member Joined: 09 Mar 2011 Location: New Jersey Status: Offline Points: 1966 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
You don't have to. We just have to wait for that person to emerge from the darkness. |
|||
Cannonball With Hat
Forum Senior Member VIP Joined: 10 Apr 2011 Location: The Opium Den Status: Offline Points: 1212 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
If I must...
|
|||
Hit it on Five.
Saxophone Scatterbrain Blitzberg Stab them in the ears. |
|||
darkshade
Forum Senior Member Joined: 09 Mar 2011 Location: New Jersey Status: Offline Points: 1966 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Besides the fact that there's almost 90 years of recordings as opposed to 23 years, even with a cap on the amount released, you also have to take into consideration, albums that came out after 1989 but recorded before 1989, such as posthumous releases by a deceased artist, or archived live albums that didn't come out until after 1989; that's still pre-'89 jazz, even though it came out later. |
|||
smartpatrol
Forum Groupie Joined: 26 May 2012 Location: My bedroom Status: Offline Points: 60 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Some really fantastic 21st century jazz: http://soundcloud.com/trio-m/tracks
|
|||
darkshade
Forum Senior Member Joined: 09 Mar 2011 Location: New Jersey Status: Offline Points: 1966 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
We just need the JMA equivalent of Walter
|
|||
AtomicCrimsonRush
Forum Groupie Joined: 20 Apr 2011 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 69 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
such a brilliant thread - cant get over it
|
|||
|
|||
Nathaniel607
Forum Newbie Joined: 18 Apr 2011 Status: Offline Points: 9 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Nope. A lot of jazz was released pre-89 - but it was a popular genre back then! Let's face it, the age of jazz has passed. It's not as popular a genre. And even jazz fans - even modern ones - are usually much more familiar with older stuff. There's no reason that jazz being made today should be worse than pre-89 stuff. So there's probably a lot of amazing unheard-of stuff out there.
|
|||
idlero
Forum Senior Member VIP member Joined: 07 Apr 2011 Status: Offline Points: 2158 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
So, are we talking about quantity vs quality?
|
|||
I think the problem with a lot of the fusion music is that it's extremely predictable, it's a rock rhythm and the solos all play the same stuff and they play it over and over again ...
Ken Burns |
|||
Nathaniel607
Forum Newbie Joined: 18 Apr 2011 Status: Offline Points: 9 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I wonder if there really is more pre-89 jazz than post? There's certainly more well-known, but pre-89, there was sort of a cap on how much could be released (record labels and all that) but now that doesn't exist.
|
|||
Ricochet
Forum Senior Member Joined: 08 Apr 2011 Location: Nauru Status: Offline Points: 319 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
|
|||
|
|||
AtomicCrimsonRush
Forum Groupie Joined: 20 Apr 2011 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 69 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Post 89 Jazz thread - we really need Walter digs here - but I have no idea to be honest
|
|||
|
|||
andyman1125
Forum Senior Member Joined: 06 Apr 2011 Location: Terra Status: Offline Points: 263 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Esbjorn Svensson Trio. That is all.
|
|||
|
|||
darkshade
Forum Senior Member Joined: 09 Mar 2011 Location: New Jersey Status: Offline Points: 1966 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
to be honest i wish i knew more post-89 jazz, but i might just be being modest, as there is more pre-89 jazz than there is post-89 jazz.
however what i do know is very good. I think this site (love it, by the way ) explains it best: "jazz has taken on so many genres and influences that creating easily definable genres is becoming increasingly difficult" since pre-89 jazz has been around so long, well documented, romanticized, and such, it's easier to seek out the best and have a very good collection. It seems to be the other way around for later jazz, not to mention less people (at least in America) listen to jazz than they used to even in the 80s. i had a thread over at PA about who the big names in jazz were TODAY, and it made me realize there is good stuff going on, even in 2011. it's just that there is less information about the artists and the albums, etc. But it's the music that counts anyway i guess ...end of first post/rant |
|||
Matt
Forum Admin Group Jazz Reviewer Joined: 16 Jan 2011 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 2525 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Oh no, Can't I escape My opinion is music will be no good after 2089. Being dead for me will be the major issue. Can't hear it.
|
|||
Matt
|
|||
js
Forum Admin Group Site admin Joined: 22 Dec 2010 Location: Memphis Status: Offline Points: 35086 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Ahem, yes ... testing
Welcome aboard Ian!
|
|||
EntertheLemming
JMA Collaborator Jazz Reviewer Joined: 16 Jan 2011 Location: Arkensas on Sea Status: Offline Points: 41 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I was just testing the software John (My 1st PM from an admin on Jazz Music Archives - I can't wait ) Edited by EntertheLemming - 16 Jan 2011 at 10:28am |
|||
js
Forum Admin Group Site admin Joined: 22 Dec 2010 Location: Memphis Status: Offline Points: 35086 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
moved to 'just for fun'
|
|||
EntertheLemming
JMA Collaborator Jazz Reviewer Joined: 16 Jan 2011 Location: Arkensas on Sea Status: Offline Points: 41 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I think this thread is kinda dumb (I only come here to share the hate around)
BTW John Zorn instructs me to do the devil's work through his music (but that's so lame, I prefer white noise) Henry NYC Edited by EntertheLemming - 16 Jan 2011 at 10:16am |
|||
EntertheLemming
JMA Collaborator Jazz Reviewer Joined: 16 Jan 2011 Location: Arkensas on Sea Status: Offline Points: 41 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
You are clearly nothing but a troll impersonating (badly) another troll
Say No to post 1989 talentless 'button pressing' trolls and celebrate the pre 89 masters of withering polemic, innovative slander and bare faced cheek |
|||
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |