Print Page | Close Window

Post 1989 Jazz

Printed From: JazzMusicArchives.com
Category: Topics not related to music
Forum Name: Just for Fun
Forum Description: Participate in trivia and knowledge games, share jokes, etc.
URL: http://www.JazzMusicArchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=17
Printed Date: 15 Jul 2020 at 6:50am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 10.16 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Post 1989 Jazz
Posted By: EntertheLemming
Subject: Post 1989 Jazz
Date Posted: 16 Jan 2011 at 10:09am
Say No to post 1989 faux jazz foolishness and embrace pre 89 luminaries

(Couldn't resist this as the first post - thanks Walter Wink)

BTW Hope he digs jazz tunes ?





Replies:
Posted By: EntertheLemming
Date Posted: 16 Jan 2011 at 10:13am
You are clearly nothing but a troll impersonating (badly) another troll

Say No to post 1989 talentless 'button pressing' trolls and celebrate the pre 89 masters of withering polemic, innovative slander and bare faced cheek Headbanger


Posted By: EntertheLemming
Date Posted: 16 Jan 2011 at 10:15am
I think this thread is kinda dumb (I only come here to share the hate around)

BTW John Zorn instructs me to do the devil's work through his music (but that's so lame, I prefer white noise)

Henry NYC


Posted By: js
Date Posted: 16 Jan 2011 at 10:26am
moved to 'just for fun'  Ermm


Posted By: EntertheLemming
Date Posted: 16 Jan 2011 at 10:27am
Originally posted by EZ Money EZ Money wrote:

moved to 'just for fun'  Ermm


I was just testing the software John Embarrassed

(My 1st PM from an admin on Jazz Music Archives - I can't wait Beer)


Posted By: js
Date Posted: 16 Jan 2011 at 10:50am
Ahem, yes ... testing Ermm

    

                                    Welcome aboard Ian!    Beer


Posted By: Matt
Date Posted: 17 Jan 2011 at 1:33pm
Oh no, Can't I escape LOL My opinion is music will be no good after 2089. Being dead for me will be the major issue. Can't hear it.

-------------
Matt


Posted By: darkshade
Date Posted: 09 Mar 2011 at 3:07pm
to be honest i wish i knew more post-89 jazz, but i might just be being modest, as there is more pre-89 jazz than there is post-89 jazz.

however what i do know is very good. I think this site (love it, by the way Cool ) explains it best: "jazz has taken on so many genres and influences that creating easily definable genres is becoming increasingly difficult"

since pre-89 jazz has been around so long, well documented, romanticized, and such, it's easier to seek out the best and have a very good collection. It seems to be the other way around for later jazz, not to mention less people (at least in America) listen to jazz than they used to even in the 80s.

i had a thread over at PA about who the big names in jazz were TODAY, and it made me realize there is good stuff going on, even in 2011. it's just that there is less information about the artists and the albums, etc. But it's the music that counts anyway i guess Tongue

...end of first post/rant


Posted By: andyman1125
Date Posted: 07 Apr 2011 at 8:12pm
Esbjorn Svensson Trio. That is all.

-------------


Posted By: AtomicCrimsonRush
Date Posted: 20 Apr 2011 at 9:29am
Post 89 Jazz thread - we really need Walter digs here - but I have no idea to be honest

-------------


Posted By: Ricochet
Date Posted: 20 Apr 2011 at 1:02pm
Originally posted by andyman1125 andyman1125 wrote:

Esbjorn Svensson Trio. That is all.


Approve


-------------



Posted By: Nathaniel607
Date Posted: 20 Apr 2011 at 2:18pm
I wonder if there really is more pre-89 jazz than post? There's certainly more well-known, but pre-89, there was sort of a cap on how much could be released (record labels and all that) but now that doesn't exist.


Posted By: idlero
Date Posted: 20 Apr 2011 at 2:54pm
So, are we talking about quantity vs quality?

-------------
I think the problem with a lot of the fusion music is that it's extremely predictable, it's a rock rhythm and the solos all play the same stuff and they play it over and over again ...
Ken Burns


Posted By: Nathaniel607
Date Posted: 20 Apr 2011 at 3:37pm
Originally posted by idlero idlero wrote:

So, are we talking about quantity vs quality?

Nope.

A lot of jazz was released pre-89 - but it was a popular genre back then! Let's face it, the age of jazz has passed. It's not as popular a genre. And even jazz fans - even modern ones - are usually much more familiar with older stuff. There's no reason that jazz being made today should be worse than pre-89 stuff. So there's probably a lot of amazing unheard-of stuff out there.


Posted By: AtomicCrimsonRush
Date Posted: 18 Feb 2012 at 3:59am
such a brilliant thread - cant get over it

-------------


Posted By: darkshade
Date Posted: 18 Feb 2012 at 9:35am
We just need the JMA equivalent of Walter

-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/MysticBoogy" rel="nofollow - My Last.fm



I go out onstage, and my intention is to make the first four rows bleed from their ears.

-Sonny Sharrock


Posted By: smartpatrol
Date Posted: 02 Jun 2012 at 10:45pm
Some really fantastic 21st century jazz: http://soundcloud.com/trio-m/tracks" rel="nofollow - http://soundcloud.com/trio-m/tracks

-------------
http://ozarksoundscape.bandcamp.com/" rel="nofollow - Looking for an experimental and eclectic hour of free music made by a teenage guy in his bedroom? Then click this!


Posted By: darkshade
Date Posted: 03 Jun 2012 at 3:24am
Originally posted by Nathaniel607 Nathaniel607 wrote:

I wonder if there really is more pre-89 jazz than post? There's certainly more well-known, but pre-89, there was sort of a cap on how much could be released (record labels and all that) but now that doesn't exist.


Besides the fact that there's almost 90 years of recordings as opposed to 23 years, even with a cap on the amount released, you also have to take into consideration, albums that came out after 1989 but recorded before 1989, such as posthumous releases by a deceased artist, or archived live albums that didn't come out until after 1989; that's still pre-'89 jazz, even though it came out later.


-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/MysticBoogy" rel="nofollow - My Last.fm



I go out onstage, and my intention is to make the first four rows bleed from their ears.

-Sonny Sharrock


Posted By: Cannonball With Hat
Date Posted: 03 Jun 2012 at 4:50pm
Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:

We just need the JMA equivalent of Walter
 
If I must...


-------------
Hit it on Five.

Saxophone Scatterbrain Blitzberg

Stab them in the ears.


Posted By: darkshade
Date Posted: 04 Jun 2012 at 9:17am
Originally posted by Cannonball With Hat Cannonball With Hat wrote:

Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:

We just need the JMA equivalent of Walter
 
If I must...


You don't have to. We just have to wait for that person to emerge from the darkness.


-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/MysticBoogy" rel="nofollow - My Last.fm



I go out onstage, and my intention is to make the first four rows bleed from their ears.

-Sonny Sharrock


Posted By: Cannonball With Hat
Date Posted: 04 Jun 2012 at 4:27pm
Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:

Originally posted by Cannonball With Hat Cannonball With Hat wrote:

Originally posted by darkshade darkshade wrote:

We just need the JMA equivalent of Walter
 
If I must...


You don't have to. We just have to wait for that person to emerge from the darkness.
 
Thank god...because 1992 was the best year for jazz ever. Approve


-------------
Hit it on Five.

Saxophone Scatterbrain Blitzberg

Stab them in the ears.



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 10.16 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2013 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk